0000120: add -java-extensions option to the toplevel

Notiz
(0000278) xclerc (Administrator) 2013-08-08 12:02	Well, the current implementation for Java extensions is based on primitives that are compiled to Java bytecode by the code generator. On the other hand, the toplevel is currently exactly the same than the original one, thus interpreting OCaml bytecode. As a consequence, to support Java extensions in the toplevel, it is necessary to either provide an implementation for the aforementioned primitives (e.g. based on reflection), or to modify the toplevel to make it use Java bytecode rather than OCaml bytecode. To summarize, there is no technical reason that this could not be done, but it needs some work. So, although it is a desirable feature, don't hold your breath.

(0000286) xclerc (Administrator) 2014-07-15 00:28	The new version (alpha1) features an alternative toplevel (namely ocamlj) that is based on Java bytecode rather than OCaml bytecode, and provides support for typer extensions.

Problem-Beziehungen